http://twitter.com/#!/ByronYork/status/333207446879342592
The IRS apologized Friday for singling out conservative groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names for audits of their applications for tax-exempt status. Translation: We’re sorry we got caught.
Want to read about that in the New York Times before lining your bird cage? Try page A11.
The IRS targeting a particular political viewpoint for scrutiny is front page news, period. Shame on the NY Times for burying it on A11
— Joseph Kaufman (@jhk49) May 11, 2013
If you look really hard, you can find a below-the-fold teaser on the front page.
All the news that’s fit to tuck away: twitter.com/RightKlik/stat… @nytimes @rsmccain @leginsurrection #tcot #IRS #Benghazi
— RightKlik (@RightKlik) May 11, 2013
It’s also buried on the New York Times website.
Hey, what’s missing from the top half of the New York Times homepage? Why, the IRS-targets-conservatives scandal!
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) May 11, 2013
Reminder: The Fishwrap of Record squeed with delight last year and patted the IRS on the back for a job well done.
Last year, the NY Times editorial board ENDORSED the IRS political attack on conservatives and tea party groups!… fb.me/PWXsKjYp
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) May 10, 2013
In light of the IRS apology, this NYT editorial from last year is… chilling.nyti.ms/y0uYcX
— Charles Sykes (@SykesCharlie) May 11, 2013
NYT more shameless than IRS. “@sykescharlie: In light of IRS apology, NYT editorial from last year is… chilling.nyti.ms/y0uYcX“
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) May 11, 2013
That time the petty tyrants at @nytimes editorial board praised IRS for targeting #teaparty groups: nytimes.com/2012/03/08/opi… (h/t @jstrevino)
— George Scoville (@stackiii) May 10, 2013
Not 1 liberal/conservative/libertarian should feel good bout this @ggreenwald IRS apologizes targeting Tea Party NYT Editors praised last yr
— SalenaZito (@SalenaZitoTrib) May 10, 2013
Exit question:
@thecaucus @joenbc will the @nytimes and @sulliview ignore that they endorsed this practice last year? nytimes.com/2012/03/08/opi…
— Michael Palmer (@M_Palmer1987) May 10, 2013
Will the editorial be retracted? We won’t hold our breath.
Related:
Math is hard: Awful IRS spokeswoman admits she’s also ‘not good at math’
AP: IRS is totally sorry for targeting groups with names that include ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot’
NYT buries story on IRS bullying conservatives; Endorsed witch hunt in 2012
..., 1, 2012, 2013, action, and, AP, apology, applications, awful, Awful IRS spokeswoman, Awful IRS spokeswoman, Awful IRS spokeswoman, Awful IRS spokeswoman, b..., B.C., Benghazi, Bird, board, breath, bullying, by, cage, can, Charles, Co., comment, conservative, conservative groups, Conservatives, delight, editorial, editors, Exit question, F., Feel, fold, friday, George, ggreenwald IRS, groups, H..., H.R., H/T, half, hard, Hey, hold, I., IRS, IRS, IRS, IRS, IRS apology, IRS political attack, IRS political attack, job, John, John Podhoretz, light, look, Mark, math, Michael, missing, Ms, names, New, New York, New York Times, news, No., NY., OPI, page, Palmer, part., party, Period, political, practice, question, Read, record, Related, reminder, s..., scandal, scrutiny, shame, Sorry, spokeswoman, STAT, status, story, Sykes, t..., T.I., targets, tcot, Tea Party, teaser, than, this, time, times, to., translation, Twitchy, Twitter, Want, website, what, will ..., witch, York, you.
